This is part of a series where I post the budgets and board expectations for various leagues in FIFA 18. Check back for more soon!
The Dutch Eredivisie is a hotbed of young talent in FIFA 18, with famed clubs like Ajax, PSV and Feyenoord producing starlets by the boatload. That makes the Eredivisie an excellent pick for a starter team in career mode, as it’s likely you’ll already have a plethora of young talents to develop at the club.
So here is every team’s budget and board expectations in the Eredivisie in FIFA 18. Hopefully it’ll help you plan out which team you want to take to glory!
ADO Den Haag
ADO Den Haag’s budget and board expectations
Transfer budget: £1,789,232
Domestic success: Medium
Continental success: Very low
Brand exposure: Low
Financial: Medium
Youth development: Low
Ajax
Ajax’s budget and board expectations
Transfer budget: £15,857,571
Domestic success: Critical
Continental success: High
Brand exposure: High
Financial: Critical
Youth development: Medium
AZ
AZ’s budget and board expectations
Transfer budget: £3,138,704
Domestic success: High
Continental success: Low
Brand exposure: Medium
Financial: High
Youth development: Medium
Excelsior
Excelsior’s budget and board expectations
Transfer budget: £1,342,035
Domestic success: Low
Continental success: Very low
Brand exposure: Very low
Financial: Medium
Youth development: Very low
FC Groningen
FC Groningen’s budget and board expectations
Transfer budget: £2,242,240
Domestic success: Medium
Continental success: Very low
Brand exposure: Medium
Financial: Medium
Youth development: Low
FC Twente
FC Twente’s budget and board expectations
Transfer budget: £1,782,000
Domestic success: Medium
Continental success: Very low
Brand exposure: Medium
Financial: High
Youth development: Low
FC Utrecht
FC Utrecht’s budget and board expectations
Transfer budget: £1,760,000
Domestic success: High
Continental success: Very low
Brand exposure: Medium
Financial: Medium
Youth development: Low
Feyenoord
Feyenoord’s budget and board expectations
Transfer budget: £10,594,232
Domestic success: Critical
Continental success: Medium
Brand exposure: High
Financial: Medium
Youth development: Low
Heracles Almelo
Heracles Almelo’s budget and board expectations
Transfer budget: £1,545,595
Domestic success: Medium
Continental success: Very low
Brand exposure: Low
Financial: Medium
Youth development: Very low
NAC Breda
NAC Breda’s budget and board expectations
Transfer budget: £1,342,035
Domestic success: Very low
Continental success: Very low
Brand exposure: Very low
Financial: Medium
Youth development: Very low
PEC Zwolle
PEC Zwolle’s budget and board expectations
Transfer budget: £1,437,656
Domestic success: Medium
Continental success: Very low
Brand exposure: Low
Financial: Medium
Youth development: Very low
PSV
PSV’s budget and board expectations
Transfer budget: £13,208,800
Domestic success: Critical
Continental success: Medium
Brand exposure: High
Financial: High
Youth development: Low
Roda JC
Roda JC’s budget and board expectations
Transfer budget: £1,632,473
Domestic success: Low
Continental success: Very low
Brand exposure: Low
Financial: Medium
Youth development: Very low
SC Heerenveen
SC Heerenveen’s budget and board expectations
Transfer budget: £2,090,739
Domestic success: Medium
Continental success: Very low
Brand exposure: Medium
Financial: Medium
Youth development: Medium
Sparta Rotterdam
Sparta Rotterdam’s budget and board expectations
Transfer budget: £1,332,454
Domestic success: Very low
Continental success: Very low
Brand exposure: Low
Financial: Low
Youth development: Medium
Vitesse
Vitesse’s budget and board expectations
Transfer budget: £1,957,243
Domestic success: High
Continental success: Very low
Brand exposure: Medium
Financial: Medium
Youth development: Low
VVV-Venlo
VVV-Venlo’s budget and board expectations
Transfer budget: £1,332,454
Domestic success: Very low
Continental success: Very low
Brand exposure: Very low
Financial: Low
Youth development: Very low
Willem II
Willem II’s budget and board expectations
Transfer budget: £1,585,607
Domestic success: Low
Continental success: Very low
Brand exposure: Low
Financial: Medium
Youth development: Low